Q

Partitioning servers within a SAN

I assume that there is or certainly could be naming convention problems associated with files/datasets. Is the only way to address this issue partitioning each server within the SAN?
LUN security should be done at the LUN level in the SAN by associating WWNs of adapters to particular LUNs in a fabric. This should be accomplished by microcode internal to each array. Using this approach eliminates the need to perform switch zoning at the fabric level, although that is still an option that can be used to further partition a fabric for management reasons (all SUN and all NT in different zones). If the array allows renaming WWN connections to system names, than "switch domain-system name" can be used as a naming convention for unpartitioned fabrics.
This was last published in March 2001

Dig Deeper on SAN management

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchSolidStateStorage

SearchConvergedInfrastructure

SearchCloudStorage

SearchDisasterRecovery

SearchDataBackup

Close