Is there a limit to partition size that a Windows 2000 server cluster can handle using an EMC SAN?
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
The only partition size issue I know of is the 4GB boot partition issue when doing an NT install onto SAN based disks from a floppy NT install. NTFS version 5 should easily handle any partition size you throw at it. Cluster resources can have issues on some vendor's subsystems when using partitions instead of full device LUNs to the reserve/release SCSI commands effecting resources when sharing the same physical devices on different partitions. This is especially true for load-balanced devices using HBA filter drivers (path failover software on the host).
I would check with your EMC rep for certified configurations when using Microsoft clustering.
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .bphAaR2qhqA^0@/searchstorage>discussion forums.
Dig Deeper on Data management tools
Related Q&A from Christopher Poelker
RAID can allow for better storage performance and higher availability, and there are many different RAID types. Read a comparison of RAID levels, as ...continue reading
SAN expert Chris Poelker compares connecting a SAN with wavelength cabling and dark fiber and discusses the pros and cons of each.continue reading
SAN expert Chris Poelker discusses how to change the size of a LUN in a Microsoft cluster server environment.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.