Q

NFSv4 is not disruptive as defined

What are your views on NFSv4 (with the various extensions)? And, do you think it will be the next disruptive storage...

technology? Will v4 be the end of iSCSI and FC from a server/client-storage interconnect?


My opinion is that NFSv4 is a significant upgrade of a major standard. It will be most important as a way for Linux servers to share data but I don't think it is disruptive the way Clayton Christensen originally defined the term and NFSv4 is not likely to create new cost/performance trajectories. Also, it will not impact storing level TCP/IP implementations like iSCSI. NFSv4 is for filing, not storing.

Regards,
Marc

Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .bphAaR2qhqA^0@/searchstorage>discussion forums.


This was last published in September 2003

Dig Deeper on SAN management

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchSolidStateStorage

SearchConvergedInfrastructure

SearchCloudStorage

SearchDisasterRecovery

SearchDataBackup

Close