Q

NFSv4 is not disruptive as defined

What are your views on NFSv4 (with the various extensions)? And, do you think it will be the next disruptive storage technology? Will v4 be the end of iSCSI and FC from a server/client-storage interconnect?


My opinion is that NFSv4 is a significant upgrade of a major standard. It will be most important as a way for Linux servers to share data but I don't think it is disruptive the way Clayton Christensen originally defined the term and NFSv4 is not likely to create new cost/performance trajectories. Also, it will not impact storing level TCP/IP implementations like iSCSI. NFSv4 is for filing, not storing.

Regards,
Marc

Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .bphAaR2qhqA^0@/searchstorage>discussion forums.


This was first published in September 2003

Dig deeper on SAN management

Pro+

Features

Enjoy the benefits of Pro+ membership, learn more and join.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

0 comments

Oldest 

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchSolidStateStorage

SearchVirtualStorage

SearchCloudStorage

SearchDisasterRecovery

SearchDataBackup

Close