NAS vs. PC-based file server
Can you please give some technical pointers for buying network attached storage (NAS) instead of a PC or server? What is the difference between NAS and a server?

    Requires Free Membership to View

    Login

    When you register for SearchStorage.com, you’ll also receive targeted emails from my team of award-winning editorial writers. Our goal is to keep you informed on the hottest topics, the latest news and the biggest challenges you face as a storage professional today.

    Rich Castagna, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchStorage.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchStorage.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

At a high level, a NAS can be described as a multiprotocol network storage appliance with an operating system optimized for file services. One of the advantages of a NAS over a traditional PC-based file server is that it can also act as a Fibre Channel or iSCSI storage array. This means it can present network share via CIFS or NFS like a PC but also give access to disk storage like disk array via iSCSI or FC. NAS appliances also come with data protection software features such as snapshots and replication.

If an organization already has a central storage array or a storage area network (SAN), it is possible to deploy a NAS gateway as an interface to some of the SAN disk and present it as CIFS or NFS shares. If you do not have or do not plan to implement a SAN but still need central storage capabilities, a NAS appliance is the way to go as it is more scalable than most PC-type file servers. If you only have a requirement to share a small amount of data on the network, a PC-type file server will likely be more cost effective.

This was first published in February 2007