When you make products like storage for markets that do not have clear vertical segmentation, you need to provide a high level of flexibility so you can sell into the largest possible market. Obviously, that is NetApp's thinking on this one. iSCSI allows them to accommodate block based storage with a native Ethernet interface. I doubt that iSCSI will replace DAFS as a strategic element, but strange things happen from time to time.
That said, supporting iSCSI doesn't further NetApp's position as the leader of file-based storage. Maybe they are identifying more with storage these days than file-based storage? We will see how they market this capability.Another interpretation is that NetApp will use iSCSI for a storage interconnect between a filer and its storage, including remote storage. I honestly don't know and I am not privy to NetApp's plans.
In general iSCSI could benefit NAS by allowing both client/server and storage I/O traffic to travel over a single infrastructure. This could help drive down the cost of NAS products.
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in our Storage Networking discussion forum at --> --> .MullaECzaUO^1@.ee83ce4!viewtype=convdate> http://searchstorage.discussions.techtarget.com/WebX?replyToMessage@200.MullaECzaUO^1@.ee83ce4!viewtype=convdate or e-mail us directly at firstname.lastname@example.org.
This was first published in October 2001