I believe that purchasing a vendor offering of a network-attached storage (NAS) product has advantages over rolling your own file server. It should be simpler to administer and have less risk of instability from some additional software being deployed on it. In addition, you get the support from the vendor as a NAS system rather than having to support the file serving application on a standard server yourself. It's a much better bet...
and much less risk (and probably cheaper in the long run) than doing your own.
The argument holds true whether you're using some Unix-type OS or W2K. WSS2003 is offered as an underlying system for NAS devices from several vendors. Other vendors may use a custom embedded OS or some standard variation of an OS for their NAS.
Look at the NAS system as a complete storage system with characteristics of performance, reliability, support, price and function. If you base it on some specific details, that may distract you from considering the system as a complete product.
Do you know…
Dig deeper on NAS hardware
Related Q&A from Randy Kerns
Learn why data protection practices common in traditional file storage environments aren't the best option for objects, and how metadata can help.continue reading
Learn how different scale-out architectures can be good options for providing high availability and easy growth.continue reading
Learn about NAS security and if SAN is more secure than NAS in this expert response.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.