I believe that purchasing a vendor offering of a network-attached storage (NAS) product has advantages over rolling...
your own file server. It should be simpler to administer and have less risk of instability from some additional software being deployed on it. In addition, you get the support from the vendor as a NAS system rather than having to support the file serving application on a standard server yourself. It's a much better bet and much less risk (and probably cheaper in the long run) than doing your own.
The argument holds true whether you're using some Unix-type OS or W2K. WSS2003 is offered as an underlying system for NAS devices from several vendors. Other vendors may use a custom embedded OS or some standard variation of an OS for their NAS.
Look at the NAS system as a complete storage system with characteristics of performance, reliability, support, price and function. If you base it on some specific details, that may distract you from considering the system as a complete product.
Do you know…
Related Q&A from Randy Kerns
What is the one hidden gotcha that you'd advise users about if they were shopping for an all-flash storage array?continue reading
How much control do you have with all-flash storage arrays? How much control do you have over how arrays handle your data? Do you control the caching?continue reading
Vendors often publish numbers for 'usable' capacity versus 'effective' capacity. Can you explain this and how can you plan flash capacity needs with ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.