Once you have completed phase 1, I would suggest looking at a second phase by gauging the costs involved in keeping the storage directly connected to the servers. Plan a migration to an array-based storage subsystem where you can dynamically add storage. For example, if this environment is mostly for file and print sharing then I would like at a Network Attached Storage (NAS) product to help cut down on the management overhead associated...
with locally attached storage on traditional servers. In addition to the economies of scale that can be realized in moving to array-based storage, one can get the advantage of RAID-protected storage and storage-based data protection capabilities, such as SnapShots and backup capabilities that go far beyond that of locally connected storage.
At the end of phase 2, which may take a year to get rolled out from the time that the process starts, you can look to see if you were able to grow with the demands of the business and continue to tune the environment to the needs of the customer. Don't expect these phases to go smoothly all of the time, as there may be many people in the organization that like things just the way that they are, but moving past these naysayers may enable you to truly master your storage environment.
Related Q&A from Brett Cooper
We are currently using an HDS9960 array and are planning to upgrade early next year to another enterprise array. We're in the process of evaluating ...continue reading
We are looking at purchasing a new storage system for our financial application, what should we be looking for? The system needs to provide very high...continue reading
Brett Cooper answers the question: What is the best practice for moving AIX 5.2 data, including an Informix database, over to a SAN that is attached ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.