I need a little insight into a problem. I have roughly 4 terabytes of data all patent images (approx. 6.5 million...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
TIF files) that will be served up via Web browser for a local LAN only (roughly 16 people). I am getting conflicting stories for what is needed, NAS or SAN. I am not worried about backing it up and I am not worried about failover/redundancy, we are a small shop. Any advice?
With 16 people accessing the data it sounds like a traditional file server type of environment. The problem is the amount of data you have - it exceeds the capacity of many NAS products. Talk to NetApp, BlueArc, Zambeel, EMC, Compaq, MTI, or Auspex. If you can't afford a big NAS system then I recommend using an NFS, Windows 2K or Netware server with a simple SAN (small switch or hub, and maybe four 2TB storage cabinets. I would mirror them because mirrored disk is always a good idea). Make sure you have a volume manager or RAID controller available that allows you to combine storage volumes and mirror them.
You may even find that DAS will work for you - I would think that there could be an LVD SCSI solution that will do what you need.
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in our Storage Networking discussion forum at http://searchstorage.discussions.techtarget.com/WebX?replyToMessage@7.uALMagHuauI^1@.ee83ce4!viewtype=convdate
Dig Deeper on SAN management
Related Q&A from Marc Farley
Mark Farley discusses the difference between iFCP and FCIP.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.