Q

Implementing an active/active data center

I am currently going through a design phase of a project that will involve the following: 1. Two data centers (approximately 50Km apart) running active/active. 2. The solution will be all Windows based involving two SQL clusters, all are running on HP to include a SAN. All specs are to be determined at this point.

Interested in your thoughts about how the replication would work. Should it be done at the SAN level or SQL level? How good is the HP SAN stuff? Is it rebadge equipment, Compaq/HP? Also, any data from other companies that have successfully implemented active/active data centers solutions would be useful.
If I were building a configuration like yours, I would try to extend a single SAN between the two locations. It's a much simpler and probably less expensive approach. This way, when it comes to getting data between the sites you're NOT replicating, you're just mirroring data. 50km is well within the specified limits for most SAN vendor implementations.

With this model, you can combine traditional clustering and wide-area data replication with less hardware. You can design clusters so that they failover to the other site, just as cleanly and neatly as if they were on the local site.

Data replication requires an additional step of sending the data across the replication network (regardless of the technology in place). Mirroring is handled much more simply by a software mirroring product. Most hardware-only solutions cannot handle mirroring outside of a single disk array, so you will likely be restricted to a software-based solution.

Unfortunately, I do not have the opportunity to evaluate hardware from different vendors, so it is very difficult for me to offer opinions on specific equipment from different vendors. My advice, as always, is to ask the vendors for customer references, contact the references and then ask them hard questions about the vendor and his products.

Evan L. Marcus

Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .bphAaR2qhqA^0@/searchstorage>discussion forums.

This was first published in February 2004

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

0 comments

Oldest 

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchSolidStateStorage

  • Flash technologies remain hot in 2016, experts predict

    Experts predict solid-state technology will remain hot in 2016, leading to the demise of high-speed hard disk drives, as ...

  • Tintri VMstore T5000

    Like all of its VM-aware storage systems, Tintri’s first all-flash array -- the Tintri VMstore T5000 -- allows admins to bypass ...

  • SolidFire SF9605

    The high-capacity SolidFire SF9605 uses SolidFire’s Element OS 8 (Oxygen) to deliver new enterprise features such as synchronous ...

SearchVirtualStorage

SearchCloudStorage

SearchDisasterRecovery

SearchDataBackup

Close