Why didn't ESCON and HIPPI become the preferred standards for transport between host and host and host and peripherals? Why has Fibre Channel emerged past these technologies? Why do we need Fibre Channel if we have Gigabit Ethernet? Is it an interface issue? Could we build a USB to Fiber Interface?

Requires Free Membership to View

ESCON is proprietary, HIPPI is half duplex. FC is not necessary - some day it could be all GbE or maybe FC will prevail for storage. FC is pretty reliable and robust - it works well.

Don't hold your breath waiting for a USB/FC connect. USB is not designed for the data rates of storage networking.


This was first published in April 2001

There are Comments. Add yours.

 
TIP: Want to include a code block in your comment? Use <pre> or <code> tags around the desired text. Ex: <code>insert code</code>

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
Sort by: OldestNewest

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: