Problem solve Get help with specific problems with your technologies, process and projects.

Active/active vs. active/passive arrays

Storage expert Greg Schulz outlines the pros and cons of active/active and active/passive arrays.

What are the differences between active/active and active/passive arrays? Which technology is better?

Storage arrays (SCSI, Fibre Channel, iSCSI and NAS) with two or dual controllers (or more) can be configured in either an active/active mode or active/passive mode.

Active/passive means that one controller is active to process I/O requests, while the other is idle in standby mode ready to take over I/O activity should the active primary controller fail or be taken offline. An active/active configuration enables both controller nodes to process I/Os, and provide a standby capability for the other.

Generally, an active/active storage system involves a battery backed mirrored cache, in which the contents of a controller's cache is mirrored to another for data integrity and availability. For example, if an active/active controller has a total of 4 gigabytes (GB) of cache (e.g., 2 GB per controller), the usable amount of cache would be 50% or 2 GB due to mirroring.

Typically, a LUN will be accessed primarily via a specific controller to maintain cache coherency in what is known as LUN or cache affinity. Some controllers enable either controller to respond to a server's request for an I/O for a LUN. However, the actual I/O is resolved by a designated controller in what is known as I/O shipping. As to which approach is better, if you can afford to have one controller idle, an active/passive configuration gives predictable performance during a failover. Many NAS vendors use this model, which is often referred to as a NAS cluster. An active/active configuration enables both controllers to be active to boost performance during normal operation. However, during a failover scenario depending on the combined workload, performance could degrade.

Do you know…

How to decrease I/O latency in RAID array?

This was last published in July 2006

Dig Deeper on Primary storage devices



Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.