Misc

Majority of users opt for tiered storage

Ezine

This article can also be found in the Premium Editorial Download "Storage magazine: Exploring systems that detect and repair hard disk problems automatically."

Download it now to read this article plus other related content.

A year ago, less than half of the Storage readers we surveyed had a storage tiering process in place, but nearly 60% of those who weren't tiering said they planned to do so. Apparently, a lot of them carried through on their plans, as our most recent survey shows 59% now use tiered storage.

By Rich Castagna

Storage tiering -- putting data in its proper place -- can be a huge money saver for a storage shop by getting less-frequently accessed data off expensive primary systems and onto cheaper disks. A year ago, less than half of the Storage readers surveyed had a tiering process in place, but nearly 60% of those who weren't tiering said they planned to do so. Apparently, a lot of them carried through on their plans, as our most recent survey shows 59% now use tiered storage. In addition, half of those not yet sold on tiering said they'll take the plunge (approximately 61% will do so over the next 12 months). Those implementing storage tiers tend to keep their schemes simple: 75% limit the number of tiers they support to two or three, while 76% keep half of their data or less on primary storage. The biggest pain point related to tiering remains classifying data so it can be properly placed. Forty-two percent of respondents said it's the biggest hitch in the process vs. 41% last year.

"Successful tiered storage will be predicated on automation and granularity. Manually moving LUNs around the farm is a no-win situation." -- Survey respondent



BIO: Rich Castagna (rcastagna@storagemagazine.com) is editorial director of the Storage Media Group.

This was first published in June 2009

Join the conversationComment

Share
Comments

    Results

    Contribute to the conversation

    All fields are required. Comments will appear at the bottom of the article.